[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_exec_nop: Add a light version of signal-all

[Ashutosh Dixit]

igt at gem-exec-nop@signal-all runs a single uninterrupted loop for 150
sec. This results in the test being one of the longest execution times
in CI runs. For example:

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5654/runtimes-iclb.txt

Add a lighter version of the same test and include that in CI instead
to cut down the overall CI execution time.

Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
---
 tests/i915/gem_exec_nop.c    | 3 +++
 tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_nop.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_nop.c
index 59a08ad0..87ecd6c7 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_nop.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_nop.c
@@ -769,6 +769,9 @@ igt_main
 	igt_subtest("signal-all")
 		fence_signal(device, handle, ALL_ENGINES, "all", 150);
 
+	igt_subtest("signal-all-light")
+		fence_signal(device, handle, ALL_ENGINES, "all", 10);
+
 	igt_subtest("series")
 		series(device, handle, 150);
 
diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
index f3440f31..166f158d 100644
--- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
+++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ igt at gem_exec_flush@(?!.*basic).*
 igt at gem_exec_gttfill@(?!.*basic).*
 igt at gem_exec_latency(@.*)?
 igt at gem_exec_lut_handle(@.*)?
-igt at gem_exec_nop@(?!.*(basic|signal-all)).*
+igt at gem_exec_nop@(?!.*(basic|signal-all-light)).*
 igt at gem_exec_reloc@(?!.*basic).*
 igt at gem_exec_suspend@(?!.*basic).*
 igt at gem_exec_whisper@(?!normal$).*
-- 
2.20.1