[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_exec_nop: Add a light version of signal-all

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Ashutosh Dixit (2019-02-25 18:08:32)
> igt at gem-exec-nop@signal-all runs a single uninterrupted loop for 150
> sec. This results in the test being one of the longest execution times
> in CI runs. For example:
> 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5654/runtimes-iclb.txt
> 
> Add a lighter version of the same test and include that in CI instead
> to cut down the overall CI execution time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/i915/gem_exec_nop.c    | 3 +++
>  tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_nop.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_nop.c
> index 59a08ad0..87ecd6c7 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_nop.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_nop.c
> @@ -769,6 +769,9 @@ igt_main
>         igt_subtest("signal-all")
>                 fence_signal(device, handle, ALL_ENGINES, "all", 150);
>  
> +       igt_subtest("signal-all-light")
> +               fence_signal(device, handle, ALL_ENGINES, "all", 10);
> +
>         igt_subtest("series")
>                 series(device, handle, 150);
>  
> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> index f3440f31..166f158d 100644
> --- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ igt at gem_exec_flush@(?!.*basic).*
>  igt at gem_exec_gttfill@(?!.*basic).*
>  igt at gem_exec_latency(@.*)?
>  igt at gem_exec_lut_handle(@.*)?
> -igt at gem_exec_nop@(?!.*(basic|signal-all)).*
> +igt at gem_exec_nop@(?!.*(basic|signal-all-light)).*

The real question is why is CI running it at all.
-Chris