[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915_pm_sseu: Don't try to get enabled subslices if it's not there

[Lionel Landwerlin]

On 24/07/2019 11:38, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> The debugfs contains "Enabled SliceX subslices:" line only if a given
> slice is enabled. If we try to dbg_get_status() with everything shut
> down we will get a confusing assertion failure:
>
> CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function dbg_get_int, file ../tests/i915/i915_pm_sseu.c:120:
> CRITICAL: Failed assertion: pos != NULL
>
> To fix that let's just read the enabled subslices if the line is there,
>
> Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110593
> Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com>


Sounds alright. I've run into BXT platforms where subslice0 is fused off.


If you feel like making this test reliable, there is a bigger issue with 
some explanation there : https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103484


Acked-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>


> ---
>   tests/i915/i915_pm_sseu.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_sseu.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_sseu.c
> index 252df7d3..0b936982 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_sseu.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_sseu.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ dbg_get_status(struct status *stat)
>   	if (dbg_has_line(first, last, "Enabled Subslice Per Slice:")) {
>   		stat->hw.subslice_per =
>   			dbg_get_int(first, last, "Enabled Subslice Per Slice:");
> -	} else {
> +	} else if (dbg_has_line(first, last, "Enabled Slice0 subslices:")) {
>   		stat->hw.subslice_per =
>   			dbg_get_int(first, last, "Enabled Slice0 subslices:");
>   	}