[igt-dev] [i-g-t] intel-ci: balcklist gem_exec_alignment at pi-shared

[Petri Latvala]

On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 04:24:46PM +0530, Mastan Katragadda wrote:
> The reason for this is that it doesn't work with the dma-resv-object locking introduced
> recently in the code,and it's not going to be fixed anytime soon.
> 
> drm/i915: Perform execbuffer object locking as a separate step
> To help avoid evicting already resident buffers from the batch we're
> processing, perform locking as a separate step.
> 
> Link:https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-tip/commit/?id=5cd57f676bb946a00275408f0dd0d75dbc466d25
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mastan Katragadda <mastanx.katragadda at intel.com>

Should the test be deleted instead?


-- 
Petri Latvala


> ---
>  tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> index ca361fde..0d307730 100644
> --- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ igt at sysfs_timeslice_duration@off
>  # GEM: Not worth fixing
>  ###############################################
>  igt at gen7_exec_parse@.*lri.*
> +igt at gem_exec_alignment@pi-shared
>  ###############################################
>  # There are no DRRS capable displays in CI lab
>  ###############################################
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>