[igt-dev] [i-g-t] intel-ci: balcklist gem_exec_alignment at pi-shared

[Katragadda, MastanX]

Hi   Chris/Thomas,
 
  Can we remove pi-shared test from igt?

Thanks,
Mastan

-----Original Message-----
From: Latvala, Petri <petri.latvala at intel.com> 
Sent: 08 December 2021 17:02
To: Katragadda, MastanX <mastanx.katragadda at intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org; Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay at intel.com>; Hellstrom, Thomas <thomas.hellstrom at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [i-g-t] intel-ci: balcklist gem_exec_alignment at pi-shared

On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 04:24:46PM +0530, Mastan Katragadda wrote:
> The reason for this is that it doesn't work with the dma-resv-object 
> locking introduced recently in the code,and it's not going to be fixed anytime soon.
> 
> drm/i915: Perform execbuffer object locking as a separate step To help 
> avoid evicting already resident buffers from the batch we're 
> processing, perform locking as a separate step.
> 
> Link:https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-tip/commit/?id=5cd57f676bb946a00
> 275408f0dd0d75dbc466d25
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mastan Katragadda <mastanx.katragadda at intel.com>

Should the test be deleted instead?


--
Petri Latvala


> ---
>  tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> index ca361fde..0d307730 100644
> --- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ igt at sysfs_timeslice_duration@off
>  # GEM: Not worth fixing
>  ###############################################
>  igt at gen7_exec_parse@.*lri.*
> +igt at gem_exec_alignment@pi-shared
>  ###############################################
>  # There are no DRRS capable displays in CI lab
>  ###############################################
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>