[igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] intel_gpu_top: Wrap interactive header
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Feb 3 11:00:44 UTC 2021
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-03 10:31:04)
>
> On 01/02/2021 12:07, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-01 11:57:56)
> >> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> >>
> >> Slight improvement with regards to wrapping header components to fit
> >> console width. If a single element is wider than max it can still
> >> overflow but it should now work better for practical console widths.
> >
> > <----
> > intel-gpu-top: Intel Kabylake (Gen9) @ /dev/dri/card0
> > 900/ 949 MHz; 0% RC6; 6.97/18.42 W; 2 irqs/s
> > IMC reads: 6 MiB/s
> > IMC writes: 0 MiB/s
> >
> > ---->
> > intel-gpu-top: Intel Kabylake (Gen9) @ /dev/dri/card0 - 903/ 954 MHz; 0% RC6
> > 7.16/18.40 W; 14 irqs/s
> >
> > IMC reads: 80 MiB/s
> > IMC writes: 0 MiB/s
> >
> > I thought it looked reasonably tidy, without adding any lines to the
> > header.
>
> Or on a wider terminal:
> <----
> intel-gpu-top: Intel Skylake (Gen9) @ /dev/dri/card0
> 0/ 0 MHz; 100% RC6; 0.00/ 1.29 W; 0 irqs/s
> IMC reads: 138 MiB/s
> IMC writes: 6 MiB/s
> --->
> intel-gpu-top: Intel Skylake (Gen9) @ /dev/dri/card0 - 0/ 0 MHz; 100% RC6; 0.00/ 0.00 W; 0 irqs/s
>
> IMC reads: 77 MiB/s
> IMC writes: 4 MiB/s
>
>
> So a "fight" between 80 chars vs 120 (or so). :) It may be a bit of an over-engineered solution but I don't like the wrap on a wide terminal, plus I like an extra blank line.
But the memory counters are visually similar to the
frequency/rc6/power/interrupts...
-Chris
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list