[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping: Fix bug in test_smem_oom

[Ramalingam C]

On 2022-04-01 at 14:25:07 +0530, Melkaveri, Arjun wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 01:59:28PM +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> > On 2022-04-01 at 12:58:26 +0530, Arjun Melkaveri wrote:
> > > ctx was not initialized with all physical engines,
> > > after device reopening.
> > > This change would resolve assert issue seen in __do_evict.
> > > 
> > > v2: Added missing intel_ctx_destroy.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Arjun Melkaveri <arjun.melkaveri at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c | 4 ++++
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c b/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c
> > > index 43f0688f..432607b0 100644
> > > --- a/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c
> > > +++ b/tests/i915/gem_lmem_swapping.c
> > > @@ -428,10 +428,14 @@ static void test_smem_oom(int i915,
> > >  
> > >  		fill_params(i915, &params, region, 0, 1, true);
> > >  
> > > +		ctx = intel_ctx_create_all_physical(fd);
> > > +		__gem_context_set_persistence(fd, ctx->id, false);
> > > +
> > igt fixture already creates same kind of context and pass it here. Could
> > we reuse it across all the child and parent processes?
> > 
> > Or we need independed context only?
> > 
> > Ram.
> As we are repoening device , this has to be independed context
> "int fd = gem_reopen_driver(i915);" 
Ok. Yes got it.

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c at intel.com>
> > 
> > >  		igt_install_exit_handler(smem_oom_exit_handler);
> > >  		__do_evict(fd, ctx, &region->region, &params,
> > >  			   params.seed + child + 1);
> > >  
> > > +		intel_ctx_destroy(fd, ctx);
> > >  		close(fd);
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -- 
> > > 2.25.1
> > >