[igt-dev] [v4 4/9] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Downscaling each plane

Jessica Zhang quic_jesszhan at quicinc.com
Thu Feb 17 18:22:44 UTC 2022



On 2/17/2022 4:15 AM, Sharma, Swati2 wrote:
> Hi Jessica/Petri,
> 
> Sorry missed your mail.
> 
> Do you think we should drop upscaling and downscaling single plane tests 
> from
> my series
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98333/ ?
> That should be covered by your tests?
> 
> What do you think?

Hi Swati,

Yep, sounds good! We have upscale tests for single plane in Petri's 
patch and we can add downscale tests too.

Thanks,

Jessica Zhang

> 
> On 16-Feb-22 6:15 AM, Jessica Zhang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/15/2022 4:23 AM, Swati Sharma wrote:
>>> Subtest for testing downscaling for each plane
>>> individually (checked 1 plane per "class" like
>>> we do in other tests).
>>>
>>> v2: -set modifier as LINEAR (Ville)
>>>      -shared code for upscaling and downscaling tests (Ville)
>>>      -removed num_scaler() check and added try_commit() (Ville)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma at intel.com>
>>
>> Hi Swati,
>>
>> FYI, Petri and I have been working on a similar patch: [1][2]
>>
>> For the latest version we've modified `check_scaling_pipe_plane_rot` 
>> so that it takes in a custom buffer height/width and created multiple 
>> subtests for different scaling factors.
>>
>> I see that you've added tests for both upscaling and downscaling that 
>> do something similar. Maybe our changes to 
>> `check_scaling_pipe_plane_rot` can be useful for your series to reduce 
>> redundant code in both the upscale and downscale cases? Let me know 
>> your thoughts on this.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jessica Zhang
>>
>> [1] latest version: 
>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/470921/?series=99364&rev=2
>> [2] earlier version: 
>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/470856/?series=97584&rev=5
>>
>>> ---
>>>   tests/kms_plane_scaling.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>   1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c b/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c
>>> index 39f2de3c..e960a6c5 100644
>>> --- a/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c
>>> +++ b/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c
>>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test display plane scaling");
>>>   /* Test flags. */
>>>   enum {
>>>       TEST_UPSCALING = 1 << 0,
>>> +    TEST_DOWNSCALING = 1 << 1,
>>>   };
>>>   typedef struct {
>>> @@ -266,6 +267,48 @@ __test_plane_upscaling(data_t *d, igt_plane_t 
>>> *plane,
>>>       igt_skip_on_f(ret == -EINVAL, "Scaling op not supported\n");
>>>   }
>>> +static void
>>> +__test_plane_downscaling(data_t *d, igt_plane_t *plane,
>>> +                 enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *output)
>>> +{
>>> +    igt_display_t *display = &d->display;
>>> +    int width, height;
>>> +    drmModeModeInfo *mode;
>>> +    bool test_complete = false;
>>> +    int scaling = 50;
>>> +    int ret;
>>> +
>>> +    cleanup_crtc(d);
>>> +
>>> +    igt_output_set_pipe(output, pipe);
>>> +    mode = igt_output_get_mode(output);
>>> +    width = mode->hdisplay;
>>> +    height = mode->vdisplay;
>>> +
>>> +    igt_create_color_pattern_fb(display->drm_fd,
>>> +                    width, height,
>>> +                    DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888,
>>> +                    I915_TILING_NONE,
>>> +                    1.0, 0.0, 0.0, &d->fb[0]);
>>> +
>>> +    igt_plane_set_fb(plane, &d->fb[0]);
>>> +
>>> +    while(!test_complete) {
>>> +        igt_plane_set_size(plane, (width * scaling) / 100, (height * 
>>> scaling) / 100);
>>> +        ret = igt_display_try_commit_atomic(display, 
>>> DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET, NULL);
>>> +
>>> +        if (ret != -EINVAL)
>>> +            test_complete = true;
>>> +
>>> +        scaling += 5;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
>>> +    igt_remove_fb(display->drm_fd, &d->fb[0]);
>>> +
>>> +    igt_skip_on_f(ret == -EINVAL, "Scaling op not supported\n");
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   static void
>>>   test_plane_scaling(data_t *d, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *output, 
>>> uint32_t flags)
>>>   {
>>> @@ -285,9 +328,12 @@ test_plane_scaling(data_t *d, enum pipe pipe, 
>>> igt_output_t *output, uint32_t fla
>>>               uint32_t format = plane->drm_plane->formats[j];
>>>               if (test_format(d, &tested_formats, format) &&
>>>                   igt_plane_has_format_mod(plane, format, modifier) &&
>>> -                can_scale(d, format))
>>> +                can_scale(d, format)) {
>>>                   if (flags & TEST_UPSCALING)
>>>                       __test_plane_upscaling(d, plane, pipe, output);
>>> +                if (flags & TEST_DOWNSCALING)
>>> +                    __test_plane_downscaling(d, plane, pipe, output);
>>> +                }
>>>           }
>>>           igt_vec_fini(&tested_formats);
>>> @@ -618,6 +664,13 @@ igt_main_args("", long_opts, help_str, 
>>> opt_handler, &data)
>>>                       test_plane_scaling(&data, pipe, output, 
>>> TEST_UPSCALING);
>>>           }
>>> +        igt_describe("Tests plane downscaling.");
>>> +        igt_subtest_with_dynamic("plane-downscaling") {
>>> +            for_each_pipe_with_single_output(&data.display, pipe, 
>>> output)
>>> +                igt_dynamic_f("pipe-%s-%s-downscaling", 
>>> kmstest_pipe_name(pipe), igt_output_name(output))
>>> +                    test_plane_scaling(&data, pipe, output, 
>>> TEST_DOWNSCALING);
>>> +        }
>>> +
>>>           igt_describe("Tests scaling with pixel formats.");
>>>           igt_subtest_with_dynamic("scaler-with-pixel-format") {
>>>               for_each_pipe_with_single_output(&data.display, pipe, 
>>> output)
>>> -- 
>>> 2.25.1
>>>
> 
> -- 
> ~Swati Sharma


More information about the igt-dev mailing list