[igt-dev] [v4 4/9] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Downscaling each plane

Sharma, Swati2 swati2.sharma at intel.com
Thu Feb 17 18:37:33 UTC 2022


Okay. Rest of the patches can be merged?

On 17-Feb-22 11:52 PM, Jessica Zhang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/17/2022 4:15 AM, Sharma, Swati2 wrote:
>> Hi Jessica/Petri,
>>
>> Sorry missed your mail.
>>
>> Do you think we should drop upscaling and downscaling single plane 
>> tests from
>> my series
>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98333/ ?
>> That should be covered by your tests?
>>
>> What do you think?
> 
> Hi Swati,
> 
> Yep, sounds good! We have upscale tests for single plane in Petri's 
> patch and we can add downscale tests too.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jessica Zhang
> 
>>
>> On 16-Feb-22 6:15 AM, Jessica Zhang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/15/2022 4:23 AM, Swati Sharma wrote:
>>>> Subtest for testing downscaling for each plane
>>>> individually (checked 1 plane per "class" like
>>>> we do in other tests).
>>>>
>>>> v2: -set modifier as LINEAR (Ville)
>>>>      -shared code for upscaling and downscaling tests (Ville)
>>>>      -removed num_scaler() check and added try_commit() (Ville)
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma at intel.com>
>>>
>>> Hi Swati,
>>>
>>> FYI, Petri and I have been working on a similar patch: [1][2]
>>>
>>> For the latest version we've modified `check_scaling_pipe_plane_rot` 
>>> so that it takes in a custom buffer height/width and created multiple 
>>> subtests for different scaling factors.
>>>
>>> I see that you've added tests for both upscaling and downscaling that 
>>> do something similar. Maybe our changes to 
>>> `check_scaling_pipe_plane_rot` can be useful for your series to 
>>> reduce redundant code in both the upscale and downscale cases? Let me 
>>> know your thoughts on this.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jessica Zhang
>>>
>>> [1] latest version: 
>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/470921/?series=99364&rev=2
>>> [2] earlier version: 
>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/470856/?series=97584&rev=5
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>   tests/kms_plane_scaling.c | 55 
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>   1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c b/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c
>>>> index 39f2de3c..e960a6c5 100644
>>>> --- a/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c
>>>> +++ b/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c
>>>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test display plane scaling");
>>>>   /* Test flags. */
>>>>   enum {
>>>>       TEST_UPSCALING = 1 << 0,
>>>> +    TEST_DOWNSCALING = 1 << 1,
>>>>   };
>>>>   typedef struct {
>>>> @@ -266,6 +267,48 @@ __test_plane_upscaling(data_t *d, igt_plane_t 
>>>> *plane,
>>>>       igt_skip_on_f(ret == -EINVAL, "Scaling op not supported\n");
>>>>   }
>>>> +static void
>>>> +__test_plane_downscaling(data_t *d, igt_plane_t *plane,
>>>> +                 enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *output)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    igt_display_t *display = &d->display;
>>>> +    int width, height;
>>>> +    drmModeModeInfo *mode;
>>>> +    bool test_complete = false;
>>>> +    int scaling = 50;
>>>> +    int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +    cleanup_crtc(d);
>>>> +
>>>> +    igt_output_set_pipe(output, pipe);
>>>> +    mode = igt_output_get_mode(output);
>>>> +    width = mode->hdisplay;
>>>> +    height = mode->vdisplay;
>>>> +
>>>> +    igt_create_color_pattern_fb(display->drm_fd,
>>>> +                    width, height,
>>>> +                    DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888,
>>>> +                    I915_TILING_NONE,
>>>> +                    1.0, 0.0, 0.0, &d->fb[0]);
>>>> +
>>>> +    igt_plane_set_fb(plane, &d->fb[0]);
>>>> +
>>>> +    while(!test_complete) {
>>>> +        igt_plane_set_size(plane, (width * scaling) / 100, (height 
>>>> * scaling) / 100);
>>>> +        ret = igt_display_try_commit_atomic(display, 
>>>> DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET, NULL);
>>>> +
>>>> +        if (ret != -EINVAL)
>>>> +            test_complete = true;
>>>> +
>>>> +        scaling += 5;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>> +    igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
>>>> +    igt_remove_fb(display->drm_fd, &d->fb[0]);
>>>> +
>>>> +    igt_skip_on_f(ret == -EINVAL, "Scaling op not supported\n");
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>   static void
>>>>   test_plane_scaling(data_t *d, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t 
>>>> *output, uint32_t flags)
>>>>   {
>>>> @@ -285,9 +328,12 @@ test_plane_scaling(data_t *d, enum pipe pipe, 
>>>> igt_output_t *output, uint32_t fla
>>>>               uint32_t format = plane->drm_plane->formats[j];
>>>>               if (test_format(d, &tested_formats, format) &&
>>>>                   igt_plane_has_format_mod(plane, format, modifier) &&
>>>> -                can_scale(d, format))
>>>> +                can_scale(d, format)) {
>>>>                   if (flags & TEST_UPSCALING)
>>>>                       __test_plane_upscaling(d, plane, pipe, output);
>>>> +                if (flags & TEST_DOWNSCALING)
>>>> +                    __test_plane_downscaling(d, plane, pipe, output);
>>>> +                }
>>>>           }
>>>>           igt_vec_fini(&tested_formats);
>>>> @@ -618,6 +664,13 @@ igt_main_args("", long_opts, help_str, 
>>>> opt_handler, &data)
>>>>                       test_plane_scaling(&data, pipe, output, 
>>>> TEST_UPSCALING);
>>>>           }
>>>> +        igt_describe("Tests plane downscaling.");
>>>> +        igt_subtest_with_dynamic("plane-downscaling") {
>>>> +            for_each_pipe_with_single_output(&data.display, pipe, 
>>>> output)
>>>> +                igt_dynamic_f("pipe-%s-%s-downscaling", 
>>>> kmstest_pipe_name(pipe), igt_output_name(output))
>>>> +                    test_plane_scaling(&data, pipe, output, 
>>>> TEST_DOWNSCALING);
>>>> +        }
>>>> +
>>>>           igt_describe("Tests scaling with pixel formats.");
>>>>           igt_subtest_with_dynamic("scaler-with-pixel-format") {
>>>>               for_each_pipe_with_single_output(&data.display, pipe, 
>>>> output)
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> ~Swati Sharma

-- 
~Swati Sharma


More information about the igt-dev mailing list