[PATCH v2 i-g-t] benchmarks/gem_wsim: Fix array index issue in xe_sync object referencing

[Laguna, Lukasz]

On 12/8/2023 11:24, Marcin Bernatowicz wrote:
> During the split of xe_sync types from flags introduced in commit
> ce4e53b0faec ("drm-uapi/xe: Split xe_sync types from flags"), the array
> index of xe_sync objects was unnecessarily incremented in one of the lines.
> This caused the next line to reference the wrong xe_sync object.
>
> This patch fixes the array index issue, ensuring the correct xe_sync
> object is referenced.
>
> Fixes: ce4e53b0faec ("drm-uapi/xe: Split xe_sync types from flags")
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Bernatowicz<marcin.bernatowicz at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   benchmarks/gem_wsim.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
> index e937e1027..30673da8f 100644
> --- a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
> +++ b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
> @@ -1784,7 +1784,7 @@ xe_alloc_step_batch(struct workload *wrk, struct w_step *w)
>   	i = 0;
>   	/* out fence */
>   	w->xe.syncs[i].handle = syncobj_create(fd, 0);
> -	w->xe.syncs[i++].type = DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_SYNCOBJ;
> +	w->xe.syncs[i].type = DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_SYNCOBJ;
>   	w->xe.syncs[i++].flags = DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL;
>   	/* in fence(s) */
>   	for_each_dep(dep, w->data_deps) {

Reviewed-by: Lukasz Laguna <lukasz.laguna at intel.com 
<mailto:lukasz.laguna at intel.com>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/igt-dev/attachments/20231211/0b18eeb3/attachment.htm>