Re: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for igt_facts for fact tracking (rev2)
Peter Senna Tschudin
peter.senna at linux.intel.com
Thu Dec 19 04:56:39 UTC 2024
Dear I915,
Did you receive my previous email?
Thank you.
On 18.12.2024 06:18, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
> Dear I915,
>
>
> On 17.12.2024 15:25, Patchwork wrote:
>> == Series Details ==
>>
>> Series: igt_facts for fact tracking (rev2)
>> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/142628/
>> State : failure
>>
>> == Summary ==
>>
>> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_15854_full -> IGTPW_12325_full
>> ====================================================
>>
>> Summary
>> -------
>>
>> **FAILURE**
>>
>> Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_12325_full absolutely need to be
>> verified manually.
>>
>> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>> introduced in IGTPW_12325_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>>
>> External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12325/index.html
>>
>> Participating hosts (11 -> 12)
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Additional (1): shard-dg2-set2
>>
>> Possible new issues
>> -------------------
>>
>> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_12325_full:
>>
>> ### IGT changes ###
>>
>> #### Possible regressions ####
>>
>> * igt at gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-10ms:
>> - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][1]
>> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12325/shard-snb7/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-10ms.html
>>
>> * igt at gem_eio@in-flight-suspend:
>> - shard-glk: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
>> [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12325/shard-glk7/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend.html
>>
>> * igt at kms_color@invalid-degamma-lut-sizes:
>> - shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][3]
>> [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12325/shard-snb1/igt@kms_color@invalid-degamma-lut-sizes.html
>>
>> * igt at perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-98 at vcs1:
>> - shard-mtlp: [PASS][4] -> [FAIL][5]
>> [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15854/shard-mtlp-8/igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-98@vcs1.html
>> [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12325/shard-mtlp-5/igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-98@vcs1.html
>>
>> * igt at perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-98 at vecs1:
>> - shard-dg2: [PASS][6] -> [FAIL][7] +1 other test fail
>> [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15854/shard-dg2-7/igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-98@vecs1.html
>> [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12325/shard-dg2-10/igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-98@vecs1.html
>
> These are not related to my change.
>
>>
>>
>> #### Warnings ####
>>
>> * igt at gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded:
>> - shard-tglu: [FAIL][8] ([i915#12941]) -> [FAIL][9]
>> [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15854/shard-tglu-3/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html
>> [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12325/shard-tglu-6/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html
>>
>> * igt at kms_async_flips@crc-atomic:
>> - shard-glk: [INCOMPLETE][10] ([i915#13287]) -> [INCOMPLETE][11] +1 other test incomplete
>> [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15854/shard-glk1/igt@kms_async_flips@crc-atomic.html
>> [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12325/shard-glk6/igt@kms_async_flips@crc-atomic.html
>
> These are not related to my change.
>
> Please fix and re-run.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Peter
>
> [...]
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list