RE: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for igt_facts for fact tracking (rev2)

[Ravali, JupallyX]

Hi,
 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/142628/ - Re-reported
 
i915.CI.Full - Re-reported.
 
Thanks,
Ravali

-----Original Message-----
From: I915-ci-infra <i915-ci-infra-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Peter Senna Tschudin
Sent: 18 December 2024 10:49
To: igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org; I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for igt_facts for fact tracking (rev2)

Dear I915,


On 17.12.2024 15:25, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: igt_facts for fact tracking (rev2)
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/142628/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_15854_full -> IGTPW_12325_full 
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_12325_full absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in IGTPW_12325_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   External URL: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12325/index.html
> 
> Participating hosts (11 -> 12)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   Additional (1): shard-dg2-set2
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_12325_full:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####
> 
>   * igt at gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-10ms:
>     - shard-snb:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][1]
>    [1]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12325/shard-snb7/igt@ge
> m_eio at in-flight-contexts-10ms.html
> 
>   * igt at gem_eio@in-flight-suspend:
>     - shard-glk:          NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
>    [2]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12325/shard-glk7/igt@ge
> m_eio at in-flight-suspend.html
> 
>   * igt at kms_color@invalid-degamma-lut-sizes:
>     - shard-snb:          NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][3]
>    [3]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12325/shard-snb1/igt@km
> s_color at invalid-degamma-lut-sizes.html
> 
>   * igt at perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-98 at vcs1:
>     - shard-mtlp:         [PASS][4] -> [FAIL][5]
>    [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15854/shard-mtlp-8/igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-98@vcs1.html
>    [5]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12325/shard-mtlp-5/igt@
> perf_pmu at busy-accuracy-98@vcs1.html
> 
>   * igt at perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-98 at vecs1:
>     - shard-dg2:          [PASS][6] -> [FAIL][7] +1 other test fail
>    [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15854/shard-dg2-7/igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-98@vecs1.html
>    [7]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12325/shard-dg2-10/igt@
> perf_pmu at busy-accuracy-98@vecs1.html

These are not related to my change.

> 
>   
> #### Warnings ####
> 
>   * igt at gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded:
>     - shard-tglu:         [FAIL][8] ([i915#12941]) -> [FAIL][9]
>    [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15854/shard-tglu-3/igt@gem_tiled_swapping@non-threaded.html
>    [9]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12325/shard-tglu-6/igt@
> gem_tiled_swapping at non-threaded.html
> 
>   * igt at kms_async_flips@crc-atomic:
>     - shard-glk:          [INCOMPLETE][10] ([i915#13287]) -> [INCOMPLETE][11] +1 other test incomplete
>    [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_15854/shard-glk1/igt@kms_async_flips@crc-atomic.html
>    [11]: 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_12325/shard-glk6/igt@km
> s_async_flips at crc-atomic.html

These are not related to my change.

Please fix and re-run.

Thank you,

Peter

[...]