[PATCH i-g-t 4/5] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Improvise the plane scaling BW issues

[Nautiyal, Ankit K]

On 7/15/2024 9:16 PM, Naladala Ramanaidu wrote:
> Anticipating bandwidth issues, we expect many tests to fail. To
> address these failures, we will switch to the next lowest display
> modes. Higher display modes will be identified as insufficient for
> downscaling operations on plane scaling. As a solution, we
> will implement a fix: when bandwidth is inadequate for current
> modes, the system will automatically attempt the next lower
> display mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naladala Ramanaidu <ramanaidu.naladala at intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/kms_plane_scaling.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>   1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c b/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c
> index 1702ec8c8..020d72953 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c
> @@ -582,54 +582,52 @@ static void check_scaling_pipe_plane_rot(data_t *d, igt_plane_t *plane,
>   	int w, h;
>   	int width, height;
>   
> -	mode = igt_output_get_mode(output);
> -
> -	if (is_clip_clamp == true) {
> -		width = mode->hdisplay + 100;
> -		height = mode->vdisplay + 100;
> -	} else {
> -		width = get_width(mode, sf_plane1);
> -		height = get_height(mode, sf_plane1);
> -	}
> -
> -	if (is_upscale) {
> -		w = width;
> -		h = height;
> -	} else {
> -		w = mode->hdisplay;
> -		h = mode->vdisplay;
> +	for_each_connector_mode(output) {
> +		mode = &output->config.connector->modes[j__];
> +		if (is_upscale) {
> +			w = get_width(mode, sf_plane1);
> +			h = get_height(mode, sf_plane1);
> +		} else {
> +			if (is_clip_clamp == true) {
> +				width = mode->hdisplay + 100;
> +				height = mode->vdisplay + 100;
> +			} else {
> +				width = get_width(mode, sf_plane1);
> +				height = get_height(mode, sf_plane1);
> +			}
> +			w = mode->hdisplay;
> +			h = mode->vdisplay;
> +		}
> +		/*
> +		 * guarantee even value width/height to avoid fractional
> +		 * uv component in chroma subsampling for yuv 4:2:0 formats
> +		 */
> +		w = ALIGN(w, 2);
> +		h = ALIGN(h, 2);
> +		igt_create_fb(display->drm_fd, w, h, pixel_format,
> +				modifier, &d->fb[0]);
> +		igt_plane_set_fb(plane, &d->fb[0]);
> +		igt_fb_set_position(&d->fb[0], plane, 0, 0);
> +		igt_fb_set_size(&d->fb[0], plane, w, h);
> +		igt_plane_set_position(plane, 0, 0);
> +
> +		if (is_upscale)
> +			igt_plane_set_size(plane, mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay);
> +		else
> +			igt_plane_set_size(plane, width, height);
> +
> +		if (rot != IGT_ROTATION_0)
> +			igt_plane_set_rotation(plane, rot);
> +		commit_ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> +		if (commit_ret == 0)
> +			break;
>   	}
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * guarantee even value width/height to avoid fractional
> -	 * uv component in chroma subsampling for yuv 4:2:0 formats
> -	 * */
> -	w = ALIGN(w, 2);
> -	h = ALIGN(h, 2);
> -
> -	igt_create_fb(display->drm_fd, w, h, pixel_format, modifier, &d->fb[0]);
> -
> -	igt_plane_set_fb(plane, &d->fb[0]);
> -	igt_fb_set_position(&d->fb[0], plane, 0, 0);
> -	igt_fb_set_size(&d->fb[0], plane, w, h);
> -	igt_plane_set_position(plane, 0, 0);
> -
> -	if (is_upscale)
> -		igt_plane_set_size(plane, mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay);
> -	else
> -		igt_plane_set_size(plane, width, height);
> -
> -	if (rot != IGT_ROTATION_0)
> -		igt_plane_set_rotation(plane, rot);
> -	commit_ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> -
>   	igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
>   	igt_plane_set_position(plane, 0, 0);
>   	cleanup_fbs(d);
> -
>   	igt_skip_on_f(commit_ret == -ERANGE || commit_ret == -EINVAL,
> -		      "Unsupported scaling factor with fb size %dx%d\n",
> -		      w, h);
> +			"Unsupported scaling factor with fb size %dx%d\n", w, h);

I think this is unintended change.

Otherwise looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal at intel.com>


>   	igt_assert_eq(commit_ret, 0);
>   }
>