✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for tests/intel/gem_exec_capture: Check for partial register captures (rev2)

Wed Mar 6 09:57:16 UTC 2024

Hi John,
On 2024-03-05 at 10:07:21 -0800, John Harrison wrote:
> On 3/5/2024 09:50, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> > Hi igt-dev,
> > On 2024-03-01 at 23:08:10 -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > > == Series Details ==
> > > 
> > > Series: tests/intel/gem_exec_capture: Check for partial register captures (rev2)
> > > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/130332/
> > > State : failure
> > > 
> > > == Summary ==
> > > 
> > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_14370_full -> IGTPW_10760_full
> > > ====================================================
> > > 
> > > Summary
> > > -------
> > > 
> > >    **FAILURE**
> > > 
> > >    Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_10760_full absolutely need to be
> > >    verified manually.
> > >    If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> > >    introduced in IGTPW_10760_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> > >    to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> > > 
> > >    External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10760/index.html
> > > 
> > > Participating hosts (8 -> 8)
> > > ------------------------------
> > > 
> > >    No changes in participating hosts
> > > 
> > > Possible new issues
> > > -------------------
> > > 
> > >    Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_10760_full:
> > > 
> > > ### IGT changes ###
> > > 
> > > #### Possible regressions ####
> > > 
> > >    * igt at gem_exec_capture@capture at ccs3-smem:
> > >      - shard-dg2:          [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] +13 other tests fail
> > >     [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14370/shard-dg2-10/igt@gem_exec_capture@capture@ccs3-smem.html
> > >     [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10760/shard-dg2-6/igt@gem_exec_capture@capture@ccs3-smem.html
> > > 
> > >    * igt at gem_exec_capture@capture at rcs0-smem:
> > >      - shard-mtlp:         [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] +3 other tests fail
> > >     [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14370/shard-mtlp-8/igt@gem_exec_capture@capture@rcs0-smem.html
> > >     [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10760/shard-mtlp-6/igt@gem_exec_capture@capture@rcs0-smem.html
> > > 
> > >    * igt at gem_exec_capture@capture at vecs0-lmem0:
> > >      - shard-dg1:          [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] +3 other tests fail
> > >     [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14370/shard-dg1-13/igt@gem_exec_capture@capture@vecs0-lmem0.html
> > >     [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10760/shard-dg1-19/igt@gem_exec_capture@capture@vecs0-lmem0.html
> > > 
> > >    * igt at gem_exec_capture@userptr:
> > >      - shard-dg1:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][7]
> > >     [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10760/shard-dg1-18/igt@gem_exec_capture@userptr.html
> > > 
> > Above are bugs which were spotted by a change in test.
> Correct, this is the test saying that the kernel is broken.
> 
> How does one know what build of the kernel the test was run against?
> Specifically, does it contain this patch:
> e45afbeb59347 drm/i915/guc: Correct capture of EIR register on hang

I merged it today, btw could you in future provide link(s)
to lore.kernel.org with kernel-side patch(es)?

Regards,
Kamil

> 
> 
> If not, then the test is expected to fail.
> 
> John.
> 
> > 
> > >    * igt at i915_pm_rpm@gem-execbuf-stress at extra-wait-lmem0:
> > >      - shard-dg1:          [PASS][8] -> [ABORT][9] +1 other test abort
> > >     [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14370/shard-dg1-15/igt@i915_pm_rpm@gem-execbuf-stress@extra-wait-lmem0.html
> > >     [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10760/shard-dg1-16/igt@i915_pm_rpm@gem-execbuf-stress@extra-wait-lmem0.html
> > > 
> > >    * igt at i915_pm_rpm@gem-execbuf-stress at lmem0:
> > >      - shard-dg2:          [PASS][10] -> [ABORT][11] +1 other test abort
> > >     [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14370/shard-dg2-7/igt@i915_pm_rpm@gem-execbuf-stress@lmem0.html
> > >     [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10760/shard-dg2-11/igt@i915_pm_rpm@gem-execbuf-stress@lmem0.html
> > > 
> > >    * igt at vgem_basic@unload:
> > >      - shard-glk:          [PASS][12] -> [INCOMPLETE][13]
> > >     [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14370/shard-glk8/igt@vgem_basic@unload.html
> > >     [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10760/shard-glk7/igt@vgem_basic@unload.html
> > > 
> > These are unrelated.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Kamil
> > 
> > > New tests
> > > ---------
> > > 
> > >    New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_14370_full and IGTPW_10760_full:
> > > 
> > > ### New IGT tests (4) ###
> > > 
> > >    * igt at kms_cursor_edge_walk@128x128-top-bottom at pipe-a-dp-4:
> > >      - Statuses : 1 pass(s)
> > >      - Exec time: [3.52] s
> > > 
> > >    * igt at kms_cursor_edge_walk@128x128-top-bottom at pipe-d-dp-4:
> > >      - Statuses : 1 pass(s)
> > >      - Exec time: [3.31] s
> > > 
> > >    * igt at kms_cursor_edge_walk@256x256-right-edge at pipe-a-dp-4:
> > >      - Statuses : 1 pass(s)
> > >      - Exec time: [3.46] s
> > > 
> > >    * igt at kms_cursor_edge_walk@256x256-right-edge at pipe-d-dp-4:
> > >      - Statuses : 1 pass(s)
> > >      - Exec time: [3.31] s
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Known issues
> > > ------------
> > > 
> > >    Here are the changes found in IGTPW_10760_full that come from known issues:
> > > 
> > > ### IGT changes ###
> > > 
> > > #### Issues hit ####
> > > 
> > ...cut...
> > 
> > > == Logs ==
> > > 
> > > For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10760/index.html
> 