RE: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for tests/intel/gem_exec_capture: Check for partial register captures (rev2)
Illipilli, TejasreeX
tejasreex.illipilli at intel.com
Thu Mar 7 15:36:31 UTC 2024
Hi,
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/130332/ - Re-reported.
Re-reported - Fi.CI.IGT
Addressed failures from - CI.xeBAT
Thanks,
Tejasree
-----Original Message-----
From: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny at linux.intel.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2024 3:27 PM
To: igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Harrison, John C <john.c.harrison at intel.com>; I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org; LGCI Bug Filing <lgci.bug.filing at intel.com>; Illipilli, TejasreeX <tejasreex.illipilli at intel.com>
Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for tests/intel/gem_exec_capture: Check for partial register captures (rev2)
Hi John,
On 2024-03-05 at 10:07:21 -0800, John Harrison wrote:
> On 3/5/2024 09:50, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> > Hi igt-dev,
> > On 2024-03-01 at 23:08:10 -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > > == Series Details ==
> > >
> > > Series: tests/intel/gem_exec_capture: Check for partial register captures (rev2)
> > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/130332/
> > > State : failure
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > >
> > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_14370_full -> IGTPW_10760_full
> > > ====================================================
> > >
> > > Summary
> > > -------
> > >
> > > **FAILURE**
> > >
> > > Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_10760_full absolutely need to be
> > > verified manually.
> > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> > > introduced in IGTPW_10760_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> > > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> > >
> > > External URL:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10760/index.html
> > >
> > > Participating hosts (8 -> 8)
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > > No changes in participating hosts
> > >
> > > Possible new issues
> > > -------------------
> > >
> > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_10760_full:
> > >
> > > ### IGT changes ###
> > >
> > > #### Possible regressions ####
> > >
> > > * igt at gem_exec_capture@capture at ccs3-smem:
> > > - shard-dg2: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] +13 other tests fail
> > > [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14370/shard-dg2-10/igt@gem_exec_capture@capture@ccs3-smem.html
> > > [2]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10760/shard-dg2-6/i
> > > gt at gem_exec_capture@capture at ccs3-smem.html
> > >
> > > * igt at gem_exec_capture@capture at rcs0-smem:
> > > - shard-mtlp: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] +3 other tests fail
> > > [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14370/shard-mtlp-8/igt@gem_exec_capture@capture@rcs0-smem.html
> > > [4]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10760/shard-mtlp-6/
> > > igt at gem_exec_capture@capture at rcs0-smem.html
> > >
> > > * igt at gem_exec_capture@capture at vecs0-lmem0:
> > > - shard-dg1: [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] +3 other tests fail
> > > [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14370/shard-dg1-13/igt@gem_exec_capture@capture@vecs0-lmem0.html
> > > [6]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10760/shard-dg1-19/
> > > igt at gem_exec_capture@capture at vecs0-lmem0.html
> > >
> > > * igt at gem_exec_capture@userptr:
> > > - shard-dg1: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][7]
> > > [7]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10760/shard-dg1-18/
> > > igt at gem_exec_capture@userptr.html
> > >
> > Above are bugs which were spotted by a change in test.
> Correct, this is the test saying that the kernel is broken.
>
> How does one know what build of the kernel the test was run against?
> Specifically, does it contain this patch:
> e45afbeb59347 drm/i915/guc: Correct capture of EIR register on hang
I merged it today, btw could you in future provide link(s) to lore.kernel.org with kernel-side patch(es)?
Regards,
Kamil
>
>
> If not, then the test is expected to fail.
>
> John.
>
> >
> > > * igt at i915_pm_rpm@gem-execbuf-stress at extra-wait-lmem0:
> > > - shard-dg1: [PASS][8] -> [ABORT][9] +1 other test abort
> > > [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14370/shard-dg1-15/igt@i915_pm_rpm@gem-execbuf-stress@extra-wait-lmem0.html
> > > [9]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10760/shard-dg1-16/
> > > igt at i915_pm_rpm@gem-execbuf-stress at extra-wait-lmem0.html
> > >
> > > * igt at i915_pm_rpm@gem-execbuf-stress at lmem0:
> > > - shard-dg2: [PASS][10] -> [ABORT][11] +1 other test abort
> > > [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14370/shard-dg2-7/igt@i915_pm_rpm@gem-execbuf-stress@lmem0.html
> > > [11]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10760/shard-dg2-11/
> > > igt at i915_pm_rpm@gem-execbuf-stress at lmem0.html
> > >
> > > * igt at vgem_basic@unload:
> > > - shard-glk: [PASS][12] -> [INCOMPLETE][13]
> > > [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_14370/shard-glk8/igt@vgem_basic@unload.html
> > > [13]:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10760/shard-glk7/ig
> > > t at vgem_basic@unload.html
> > >
> > These are unrelated.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kamil
> >
> > > New tests
> > > ---------
> > >
> > > New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_14370_full and IGTPW_10760_full:
> > >
> > > ### New IGT tests (4) ###
> > >
> > > * igt at kms_cursor_edge_walk@128x128-top-bottom at pipe-a-dp-4:
> > > - Statuses : 1 pass(s)
> > > - Exec time: [3.52] s
> > >
> > > * igt at kms_cursor_edge_walk@128x128-top-bottom at pipe-d-dp-4:
> > > - Statuses : 1 pass(s)
> > > - Exec time: [3.31] s
> > >
> > > * igt at kms_cursor_edge_walk@256x256-right-edge at pipe-a-dp-4:
> > > - Statuses : 1 pass(s)
> > > - Exec time: [3.46] s
> > >
> > > * igt at kms_cursor_edge_walk@256x256-right-edge at pipe-d-dp-4:
> > > - Statuses : 1 pass(s)
> > > - Exec time: [3.31] s
> > >
> > >
> > > Known issues
> > > ------------
> > >
> > > Here are the changes found in IGTPW_10760_full that come from known issues:
> > >
> > > ### IGT changes ###
> > >
> > > #### Issues hit ####
> > >
> > ...cut...
> >
> > > == Logs ==
> > >
> > > For more details see:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10760/index.html
>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list