[immodule-qt] Re: how about use postEvent instead of sendEvent in qt-immodule implementation?

[LiuCougar]

On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 01:18:15 +0900, YamaKen <yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp> wrote:
> Perhaps it will work. But its unnatural implementation requires
> more validation about event flow (such as eventfilters) and more
> maintenance cost for future development especially Qt4. So I
> think that significant value is required to implement so. But I
> can't judge the value because I can't sense the difference on my
> environment.
I agree with this point... 

> > Because, I think it makes sence that IMStart and IMEnd events are
> > processed immediatelly.
> 
> Is the difference sensible? How different?
Only under heavily loaded systems (or old and slow machines), I assume
there would be a difference.

Anyway, let's just stick to your patch

Thanks,
Cougar