[immodule-qt] a environment variable to control the module

[LiuCougar]

Ok, it seems we all agree on this modification, don't we?

I will do this task

Regards,

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:54:53 +0900, Daisuke Kameda
<kaminmat at cc.rim.or.jp> wrote:
> On Sunday 18 July 2004 10:32, YamaKen wrote:
> > Users will expect same mechanism as GTK+'s
> > because our implementation is named 'immodule'.
> 
> I also think so.
> 
> > Following work is required.
> >
> > - Decide the environment variable name
> > - Decide the precedence between the variable and qtrc
> > - Rename our identifier name 'XIM' to 'xim' to consistent with
> >   GTK+'s
> >
> > I think that the name QT_IM_MODULE is appropriate. Although
> > there is a opinion that qt-immodule should reuse GTK_IM_MODULE
> > to reduce configuration cost for users, I think that it will
> > also introduce considerable confusion and traps.
> 
> The consistency of our "immodule" and GTK+'s is important.
> So, there is meaningful that qt-immodule reuses GTK_IM_MODULE.
> 
> But, I also approve of the idea that it becomes the origin
> of confusion and trap. And, I think that introduction of environment
> variable named QT_IM_MODULE also become the origin of confusion,
> since it increases the contents to set up.
> 
> It is the better solution for users to prepare a setting tool which
> performs both the writing to qtrc and a setup of GTK_IM_MODULE.
> 
> However, Identifire name should unify with GTK+'s.
> 
> --
> Daisuke Kameda <kaminmat at cc.rim.or.jp>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> immodule-qt mailing list
> immodule-qt at freedesktop.org
> http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/immodule-qt
> 


-- 
"People's characters are strengthened through struggle against
difficulties; they are weakened by comfort."
- Old Chinese adage