[immodule-qt] Slave qt immodule support and dead key issue

[LiuCougar]

Could you consider to merge these modifications into BC branch? Only
after that, I can test it and improve scim-qtimm

Thanks

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:16:08 +0900, YamaKen <yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp> wrote:
> At Tue, 20 Jul 2004 02:01:58 +0100,
> liucougar at gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 09:50:41 +0900, YamaKen <yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp> wrote:
> > > But I don't know whole signal implementation, so another way may
> > > be possible (connecting signal to signal?). Please let me know
> > > if it exists.
> > Yeap, you got it: I just meant connecting signal to signal and it IS
> > possible in Qt
> 
> Oops, I had some mistakes in the previous experiment (perhaps
> binary inconsistency, I had gotten a SEGV).
> 
> Now I've gotten properly working code as you said (committed as
> r25). Thanks for the information and suggestion. And I've now
> understood the implementation by referring to qobject.cpp,
> qconnection.h, and moc_*.cpp.
> 
> -------------------------------
> 
> 
> YamaKen  yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp
> 


-- 
"People's characters are strengthened through struggle against
difficulties; they are weakened by comfort."
- Old Chinese adage