[immodule-qt] Completing comments and documents
YamaKen
yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp
Thu Jul 22 07:35:06 EEST 2004
At Thu, 22 Jul 2004 02:39:18 +0000,
LiuCougar wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 05:52:38 +0900, YamaKen <yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp> wrote:
> > As I said before, my environment shows no problem as a tested
> > result, so I cannot find out what is the problem by myself. What
> > I can do is locating the problem by binary problem search
> > algorithm based on the facts. Please provide me the freshly
> > tested results as fact.
> >
> > We had eliminated the dependencies about hardware, OS and X by
> > sharing the xev result information. What I want to do is to
> > eliminate the immodule dependency as second step. We can
> > locate the problem step by step as most efficient way.
>
> thanks for your efforts.
>
> Sorry for delayed response: I am very busy these days, so the update
> of scim-qtimm and skim will be little in coming days.
No problem. I know your active development effort. I thank you
for always inspiring me.
> As you do not have this problem, I think you are not the ideal one to
> deal with this issue. I will try to fix it after I have some time.
Okay, I'm waiting for it with interest.
Regards,
-------------------------------
YamaKen yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp
More information about the immodule-qt
mailing list