[PATCH libevdev] Disable test runs on make distcheck

Benjamin Tissoires benjamin.tissoires at gmail.com
Wed Nov 30 10:20:01 UTC 2016


On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Peter Hutterer
<peter.hutterer at who-t.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:32:12AM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Peter Hutterer
>> <peter.hutterer at who-t.net> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 09:25:35AM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Peter Hutterer
>> >> <peter.hutterer at who-t.net> wrote:
>> >> > The tests all need root, but running distcheck as root is not ideal. Disable
>> >> > the test runs (but not the build) to make it easier to verify distcheck works
>> >> > as intended.
>> >>
>> >> But that means when you do a new release, you need to run the tests,
>> >> and then distcheck through the release.sh script.
>> >> I know running distcheck as root is not ideal but at least we now that
>> >> the tests are run at each release.
>> >
>> > well, the tests *should* be round at every push, for every commit (and I
>> > currently do so). So the only thing distcheck does is check whether the
>> > tarballs are useful and that's not run often enough.
>> >
>>
>> Right, but my question is more: "do we trust enough the release
>> manager to run the tests (at least before each release) or should we
>> *enforce* the tests to be run at least once".
>
> I'd probably say that if you can't trust the release manager to run make
> check then you have general problems with a project ;)
>
>> After that, it's entirely up to you. I just raised my concerns (and I
>> will sleep tonight knowing that I did my duty today).
>
> very well. sweet dreams :)
>

In that case, the patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires at gmail.com>

Cheers,
Benjamin


More information about the Input-tools mailing list