[Bug 54089] [SNB regression] Power consumption goes postal after resume

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54089

Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |NEEDINFO

--- Comment #56 from Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com> ---
Can you reproduce it at any time?

I think I reproduced it here, but when I start measure with powermeter I
couldn't verify it anymore.

If you are able to reproduce at any time, could you please test the patch that
I'm attaching here? This patch above changes the current init sequence for one
that I have documented here, line by line, value by value. In the end it is not
so efficient as the current one... around 0.6W more, but I think it might be
useful to check if it kills current bugs related to RC6 in SNB. just in case...

thanks

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20130216/958577ea/attachment.html>