[Bug 65391] [i945]igt/gem_lut_handle Aborted

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65391

Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> ---
commit f1e9e300fa82181182e2e92ccce078682829a3a2
Author: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Wed Jun 5 11:10:04 2013 +0100

    gem_lut_handle: Make the error checking explicit for LUT handling

    What this test is interested in is the handling of the LUT for very
    large arrays, irrespective of whether such batch are actually
    executable. So adjust the pass/fail checks to be explicit in the error
    they are looking for, so that we do not conflate memory/aperture
    pressure as a failure in the LUT API.

    Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65391
    Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20130605/4653feda/attachment.html>