[Bug 72103] [BDW]igt/gem_persistent_relocs/forked-faulting-reloc-thrash-inactive causes assertion failure function

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Thu Nov 28 23:17:55 PST 2013


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72103

Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |NEEDINFO

--- Comment #3 from Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The subtests which do _not_ start with forked like
> igt/gem_reloc_vs_gpu/interruptible and igt/gem_reloc_vs_gpu/normal failed
> either.

"either" doesn't parse here for me and makes your answer ambigious. So does
../interruptible and ../normal work on bdw?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20131129/067e0888/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the intel-gfx-bugs mailing list