[Bug 72103] [BDW]igt/gem_persistent_relocs/forked-faulting-reloc-thrash-inactive causes assertion failure function

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72103

Guo Jinxian <jinxianx.guo at intel.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |NEW

--- Comment #4 from Guo Jinxian <jinxianx.guo at intel.com> ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > The subtests which do _not_ start with forked like
> > igt/gem_reloc_vs_gpu/interruptible and igt/gem_reloc_vs_gpu/normal failed
> > either.
> 
> "either" doesn't parse here for me and makes your answer ambigious. So does
> ../interruptible and ../normal work on bdw?

igt/gem_reloc_vs_gpu/interruptible failed
igt/gem_reloc_vs_gpu/normal  failed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20131129/e6427a5b/attachment.html>