[Bug 69248] [Baytrail-M] mismatch in clock for eDP

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Fri Sep 13 01:05:57 PDT 2013


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69248

Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[Baytrail-M] Boot up with   |[Baytrail-M] mismatch in
                   |"[drm:intel_pipe_config_com |clock for eDP
                   |pare] *ERROR* mismatch in   |
                   |clock" and "Call Trace"     |

--- Comment #3 from Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> If eDP disabled, no matter whether VGA enabled or not ,there's also
> call_trace and error, but "[drm:intel_pipe_config_compare] *ERROR* mismatch
> in clock" disappeared. 

Thanks, I've updated the summary.

> Error:
> --------------------
> [    4.713728] [drm:valleyview_enable_rps] *ERROR* GT fifo had a previous
> error 10

That's a different bug, can you please file a new report for it?

> Call Trace:
> --------------------
> [    2.672633] fb: conflicting fb hw usage inteldrmfb vs EFI VGA - removing
> gene
> ric driver
> [    2.672973] Console: switching to colour dummy device 80x25
> [    2.691967] i915 0000:00:02.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [    2.760073] [drm:intel_detect_pch], No PCH found?
> [    2.760338] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> [    2.760351] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
> [    2.760358] turning off the locking correctness validator.
> [    2.760369] CPU: 0 PID: 1191 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted
> 3.11.0-rc7_drm-i
> ntel-next-queued_e14c68_20130912+ #1
> [    2.760381] Hardware name: Intel Corp. VALLEYVIEW B2 PLATFORM/NOTEBOOK,
> BIOS
> BBAYCRB1.X64.0055.R31.1308081542 BBAY_X64_R_V0055_31 08/08/2013
> [    2.760394]  0000000000000000 ffff88003f9f16a8 ffffffff817d020f
> 0000000000000
> 006
> [    2.760409]  ffffffff82859810 ffff88003f9f1778 ffffffff81089328
> 0000000000000006
> [    2.760422]  0000000700046e00 ffffffff828a7470 0000000000000000
> ffffffff00000000
> [    2.760436] Call Trace:
> [    2.760449]  [<ffffffff817d020f>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
> [    2.760465]  [<ffffffff81089328>] __lock_acquire+0x8b4/0x183b
> [    2.760477]  [<ffffffff8108b004>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x142/0x19e
> [    2.760490]  [<ffffffff8108b06d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
> [    2.760501]  [<ffffffff8104fb0d>] ? __flush_work+0x3a/0x1cc
> [    2.760513]  [<ffffffff8107b4ea>] ? vprintk_emit+0x453/0x47f
> [    2.760524]  [<ffffffff8108a7b3>] lock_acquire+0xcc/0x106
> [    2.760534]  [<ffffffff8104fd30>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x5a
> [    2.760545]  [<ffffffff8108ae96>] ? mark_held_locks+0xce/0xfa
> [    2.760556]  [<ffffffff8104fd61>] flush_work+0x36/0x5a
> ...............
> ...............

That's again a different bug. Please file a new bug report for it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20130913/72a8bbc3/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the intel-gfx-bugs mailing list