[Bug 69248] [Baytrail-M] mismatch in clock for eDP
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Fri Sep 13 01:05:57 PDT 2013
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69248
Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[Baytrail-M] Boot up with |[Baytrail-M] mismatch in
|"[drm:intel_pipe_config_com |clock for eDP
|pare] *ERROR* mismatch in |
|clock" and "Call Trace" |
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> If eDP disabled, no matter whether VGA enabled or not ,there's also
> call_trace and error, but "[drm:intel_pipe_config_compare] *ERROR* mismatch
> in clock" disappeared.
Thanks, I've updated the summary.
> Error:
> --------------------
> [ 4.713728] [drm:valleyview_enable_rps] *ERROR* GT fifo had a previous
> error 10
That's a different bug, can you please file a new report for it?
> Call Trace:
> --------------------
> [ 2.672633] fb: conflicting fb hw usage inteldrmfb vs EFI VGA - removing
> gene
> ric driver
> [ 2.672973] Console: switching to colour dummy device 80x25
> [ 2.691967] i915 0000:00:02.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [ 2.760073] [drm:intel_detect_pch], No PCH found?
> [ 2.760338] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> [ 2.760351] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
> [ 2.760358] turning off the locking correctness validator.
> [ 2.760369] CPU: 0 PID: 1191 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted
> 3.11.0-rc7_drm-i
> ntel-next-queued_e14c68_20130912+ #1
> [ 2.760381] Hardware name: Intel Corp. VALLEYVIEW B2 PLATFORM/NOTEBOOK,
> BIOS
> BBAYCRB1.X64.0055.R31.1308081542 BBAY_X64_R_V0055_31 08/08/2013
> [ 2.760394] 0000000000000000 ffff88003f9f16a8 ffffffff817d020f
> 0000000000000
> 006
> [ 2.760409] ffffffff82859810 ffff88003f9f1778 ffffffff81089328
> 0000000000000006
> [ 2.760422] 0000000700046e00 ffffffff828a7470 0000000000000000
> ffffffff00000000
> [ 2.760436] Call Trace:
> [ 2.760449] [<ffffffff817d020f>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
> [ 2.760465] [<ffffffff81089328>] __lock_acquire+0x8b4/0x183b
> [ 2.760477] [<ffffffff8108b004>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x142/0x19e
> [ 2.760490] [<ffffffff8108b06d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
> [ 2.760501] [<ffffffff8104fb0d>] ? __flush_work+0x3a/0x1cc
> [ 2.760513] [<ffffffff8107b4ea>] ? vprintk_emit+0x453/0x47f
> [ 2.760524] [<ffffffff8108a7b3>] lock_acquire+0xcc/0x106
> [ 2.760534] [<ffffffff8104fd30>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x5a
> [ 2.760545] [<ffffffff8108ae96>] ? mark_held_locks+0xce/0xfa
> [ 2.760556] [<ffffffff8104fd61>] flush_work+0x36/0x5a
> ...............
> ...............
That's again a different bug. Please file a new bug report for it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20130913/72a8bbc3/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the intel-gfx-bugs
mailing list