[Bug 93029] Hangcheck timer too agressive to pass dEQP for SNBGT1
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Mon Dec 14 09:07:28 PST 2015
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93029
--- Comment #17 from Mark Janes <mark.a.janes at intel.com> ---
(In reply to Eero Tamminen from comment #14)
> I'm not familiar with these tests.
>
> Why these particular tests are named as "long running", how long they're
> _supposed_ to run?
>
> Because I know that other gfx chip drivers have also watchdogs, I'm just
> wondering are they actually supposed to trigger hangcheck...
Eero, you may be right about the intention of the tests, it's hard to know.
However, it seems like they could use an infinite loop if they really wanted to
trigger hangcheck.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20151214/b490b0a0/attachment.html>
More information about the intel-gfx-bugs
mailing list