[Bug 111873] [CI][SHARDS] igt at perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-98-vcs1- fail - Failed assertion: (double)(100.0 * busy_r) <= ((double)(100.0 * expected) + (2)) && (double)(100.0 * busy_r) >= ((double)(100.0 * expected) - (2))

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111873

--- Comment #2 from CI Bug Log <cibuglog at gmail.com> ---
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:

{- TGL: igt at perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-* - fail - Failed assertion: (double)(100.0
* busy_r) <= ((double)(100.0 * expected) + (2)) && (double)(100.0 *
busy_r) >= ((double)(100.0 * expected) - (2)) -}
{+ TGL: igt at perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-* - fail - Failed assertion: (double)(100.0
* busy_r) <= ((double)(100.0 * expected) + (2)) && (double)(100.0 *
busy_r) >= ((double)(100.0 * expected) - (2)) +}

New failures caught by the filter:

  *
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6980/shard-tglb3/igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-2-vcs0.html
  *
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6980/shard-tglb6/igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-50-vecs0.html
  *
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6981/shard-tglb1/igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-50-vcs1.html
  *
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6982/shard-tglb2/igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-50-vecs0.html
  *
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6982/shard-tglb4/igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-2-bcs0.html
  *
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6982/shard-tglb5/igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-50-vcs0.html
  *
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6982/shard-tglb6/igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-98-bcs0.html

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20191002/003224f2/attachment.html>