[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Require xserver 1.3

Eric Anholt eric at anholt.net
Fri Apr 17 22:13:04 CEST 2009

On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 11:49 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 14:27 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >> I don't think anyone tests this against an old server anymore.
> >
> > I love this idea, but I think airlied was using something related to
> > this code.  airlied, any opinion here?
> >
> we still use this for building against RHEL5.

OK, but do you need this for building 2.8 on RHEL5?  Or can we safely
delete?  My opinion at this point is that for 2.8 (june) we should
remove pre-server 1.6 support as nobody would be shipping 2.8 against a
server older than that.

I mean, if we're removing DRI1 support in 2.8, then you wouldn't want
2.8 pre server 1.6 anyway.

Eric Anholt
eric at anholt.net                         eric.anholt at intel.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20090417/84f98efa/attachment.sig>

More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list