[Intel-gfx] discussion about dropping xaa and exa support?

[Eric Anholt]

On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 00:28 +0200, Roberth Sjonøy wrote:
> Isn't a little bit early to drop xaa and exa support since linux is
> the os which uxa is only working on?

The 2.7.0 release, and the 2.7 branch both remain for people trying to
use the driver on OSes without kernel memory management.  I think the
state of bugzilla is an excellent argument that people without kernel
memory management really don't want to be running our latest code
anyway.

-- 
Eric Anholt
eric at anholt.net                         eric.anholt at intel.com


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20090428/350cc45d/attachment.sig>