[Intel-gfx] discussion about dropping xaa and exa support?

Eric Anholt eric at anholt.net
Tue Apr 28 09:08:19 CEST 2009

On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 00:28 +0200, Roberth Sjon√ły wrote:
> Isn't a little bit early to drop xaa and exa support since linux is
> the os which uxa is only working on?

The 2.7.0 release, and the 2.7 branch both remain for people trying to
use the driver on OSes without kernel memory management.  I think the
state of bugzilla is an excellent argument that people without kernel
memory management really don't want to be running our latest code

Eric Anholt
eric at anholt.net                         eric.anholt at intel.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20090428/350cc45d/attachment.sig>

More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list