[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Use same DPLL calculation logic to calculate the LVDS downclock and normal clock
Matthew Garrett
mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
Tue Dec 15 19:35:19 CET 2009
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:13:51PM +0800, yakui.zhao at intel.com wrote:
> According to the spec only one M/N/P combination is appropriate for one given
> clock regardless of normal clock or reduced downclock. This M/N/P combination
> is defined in one spreadsheet(Of course our code uses the find_pll callback
> function to calculate the M/N/P instead of looking up it in table). In theory
> we should get the same DPLL divider factor(P) for the normal clock and reduced
> downclock when the LVDS reduced downclock is found on one laptop.
> If we get the diferent divider factor(P) for normal clock and reduced
> clock, the reduced downclock is incorrect and should be discarded.
What is the potential downside of using an "incorrect" M/N/P?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list