[Intel-gfx] [stable] intel drm patches for 2.6.30.3 (was Re: Intel 2009Q2 release)

Arkadiusz Miskiewicz arekm at maven.pl
Wed Jul 22 19:43:20 CEST 2009


On Wednesday 22 of July 2009, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:30:26AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 of July 2009, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 22 of July 2009, Jin, Gordon wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > We'd like to recommend 2009Q2 package
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > The newer kernel (2.6.31) contains more kernel fixes, so generally
> > > > better than older kernel. If you want to stick to 2.6.30, you might
> > > > need the additional patches linked in the above webpage.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Were these patches sent to stable at kernel.org for inclusion into
> > > 2.6.30.3 ?
> >
> > If not, here it is.
> >
> > Stable team, please include commits visible below into 2.6.30.3 queue.
> > These patches are recommended by intel team for 2.6.30 users, see
> > http://intellinuxgraphics.org/2009Q2.html and are already in Linus tree.
> >
> > 1fd1c624362819ecc36db2458c6a972c48ae92d6
> > drm/i915: Save/restore cursor state on suspend/resume.
> >
> > 70aa96ca2d8d938fc036ef8fd189b0151f4fc3ba
> > drm/i915: add ignore lvds quirk info for AOpen Mini PC
> >
> > 42c2798b35b95c471877133e19ccc3cab00e9b65
> > drm/i915: apply G45 vblank count code to all G4x chips and fix
> > max_frame_count
> >
> > b66d18ddb16603d1e1ec39cb2ff3abf3fd212180
> > drm/i915: avoid non-atomic sysrq execution
> >
> > fa0864b26b4bfa1dd4bb78eeffbc1f398cb56425
> > drm/i915: Skip lvds with Aopen i945GTt-VFA
> >
> > 03d6069912babc07a3da20e715dd6a5dc8f0f867
> > drm/i915: Hook connector to encoder during load detection (fixes tv/vga
> > detect)
> >
> > b5aa8a0fc132dd512c33e7c2621d075e3b77a65e
> > drm/i915: initialize fence registers to zero when loading GEM
> >
> > 6ff4fd05676bc5b5c930bef25901e489f7843660
> > drm/i915: Set SSC frequency for 8xx chips correctly
>
> Can I get some verification that all of these work properly on .30.2?

Well, I rely on information provided by intel people who say "This release has 
been tested on following platforms: G45, GM45, GM965, G965, G35, G33, 945GM, 
945GME, 915GM, 855GM.", so I this should include kernel + patches (as that's 
part of "release").

Maybe someone on intel-gfx@ will confirm that.

>
> And in what order should they be applied in?

The order as in my email.

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


-- 
Arkadiusz Miƛkiewicz        PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl            http://ftp.pld-linux.org/



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list