[Intel-gfx] Requesting proposals for a 2.7.1 maintenance release

[Keith Packard]

On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 11:50 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:

> Why?  They appear to be cleanups rather than real bugfixes.

The first one is pure cleanup, but the second one corrects a request to
include the specified number of dwords instead of being one short. This
didn't appear to cause any problems, but it seems best to conform to the
hardware spec.

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20090508/c6734c92/attachment.sig>