[Intel-gfx] progress on FBC regression bug?

[Jesse Barnes]

On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:02:44 +0100
Alexey Fisher <bug-track at fisher-privat.net> wrote:

> Am Samstag, den 07.11.2009, 14:53 -0800 schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> > Yeah I think that set of fixes was mainly for GM45...  Anyway I'll
> > try to reproduce it.
> > 
> > Alexey Fisher <bug-track at fisher-privat.net> wrote:
> > 
> > >Am Samstag, den 07.11.2009, 10:37 -0800 schrieb Eric Anholt:
> > >> On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 09:37 +0100, Alexey Fisher wrote:
> > >> > Hallo Jesse,
> > >> > 
> > >> > are there any work on the regression introduced by FBC patch?
> > >> > I was busy with ext4 corruption regression, so no intel
> > >> > testing was done. I see 2.6.32-rc6 still has this issue. Here
> > >> > are reg_dump diff befor and anfter resume, i hope this will
> > >> > help you to fix it(HW: "Vendor: 0x8086, Device: 0x27ae,
> > >> > Revision: 0x03 (??)" asus eeepc 1005ha):
> > >> 
> > >> The fixes were merged after rc6.
> > >> 
> > >Currently i use latest 2.6.32-rc6-00130-g5b8f0be
> > >anholt/drm-intel.git, are this fix here to? Because i have this
> > >issue on this kernel.
> 
> Just curious, how do you test new kernel on netbook? Do you compile
> kernel on netbook or crosscompile it on some pc? Create deb/rps or
> normal install? Bisecting :) ?

I still haven't been able to reproduce this Alexey, but I'll be
focusing on regressions like this over the next couple of weeks and
hopefully I'll be able to nail it down.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center