[Intel-gfx] progress on FBC regression bug?

[Alexey Fisher]

Am Dienstag, den 24.11.2009, 13:05 -0800 schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:02:44 +0100
> Alexey Fisher <bug-track at fisher-privat.net> wrote:
> 
> > Am Samstag, den 07.11.2009, 14:53 -0800 schrieb Jesse Barnes:
> > > Yeah I think that set of fixes was mainly for GM45...  Anyway I'll
> > > try to reproduce it.
> > > 
> > > Alexey Fisher <bug-track at fisher-privat.net> wrote:
> > > 
> > > >Am Samstag, den 07.11.2009, 10:37 -0800 schrieb Eric Anholt:
> > > >> On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 09:37 +0100, Alexey Fisher wrote:
> > > >> > Hallo Jesse,
> > > >> > 
> > > >> > are there any work on the regression introduced by FBC patch?
> > > >> > I was busy with ext4 corruption regression, so no intel
> > > >> > testing was done. I see 2.6.32-rc6 still has this issue. Here
> > > >> > are reg_dump diff befor and anfter resume, i hope this will
> > > >> > help you to fix it(HW: "Vendor: 0x8086, Device: 0x27ae,
> > > >> > Revision: 0x03 (??)" asus eeepc 1005ha):
> > > >> 
> > > >> The fixes were merged after rc6.
> > > >> 
> > > >Currently i use latest 2.6.32-rc6-00130-g5b8f0be
> > > >anholt/drm-intel.git, are this fix here to? Because i have this
> > > >issue on this kernel.
> > 
> > Just curious, how do you test new kernel on netbook? Do you compile
> > kernel on netbook or crosscompile it on some pc? Create deb/rps or
> > normal install? Bisecting :) ?
> 
> I still haven't been able to reproduce this Alexey, but I'll be
> focusing on regressions like this over the next couple of weeks and
> hopefully I'll be able to nail it down.

May be you have anything i can test now? Add some printks ?