[Intel-gfx] drm-intel-next regression on new chip again

[Jin, Gordon]

Zhenyu Wang wrote on Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM:
> I have to pass i915.powersave=0 against drm-intel-next for
> bring up again both on clarkdale and arrandale. I haven't
> tracked down the bad commit, but just like to request for
> more care about new feature enabling.

looks like http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23915?
 
> I think only enabling feature on known-to-work (or more
> strict tested-to-work) chipsets is the most simple step to
> eliminate possible regression on other chipsets. Could we
> do that in the future?
> 
> Thanks.