[Intel-gfx] drm-intel-next regression on new chip again

[Zhenyu Wang]

I have to pass i915.powersave=0 against drm-intel-next for
bring up again both on clarkdale and arrandale. I haven't
tracked down the bad commit, but just like to request for
more care about new feature enabling.

I think only enabling feature on known-to-work (or more 
strict tested-to-work) chipsets is the most simple step to
eliminate possible regression on other chipsets. Could we
do that in the future?

Thanks.

-- 
Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd.

$gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20090914/94818141/attachment.sig>