[Intel-gfx] [Mesa3d-dev] i965 OpenGL is heavily broken again

[Maxim Levitsky]

On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:36 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:18:07 +0200
> Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:55 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:42:21 +0200
> > > Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > After quite long period of inactivity, I updated graphical stack on my
> > > > desktop/server.
> > > > 
> > > > To say the truth, I did such update about month ago, but found out that
> > > > X refuses flatly to use DRI modules. I assumed that it was my mistake in
> > > > compilation process (although it is automated).
> > > 
> > > That generally indicates a build or config problem of some kind.  Did
> > > you ever narrow it down?
> > Because the same compile process works now, I suspect that wasn't build
> > failure.
> 
> Well something weird is going on; maybe you didn't build X after Mesa
> or with the right Mesa includes?
I am very sure that this issue isn't relevant now.

I do compile (libdrm, mesa, xserver, xf86-intel, and evdev driver in
that order, compiling everything from scratch (doing git clean -dfx in
all directories)





> 
> > I now compiled same stack, but reverted mesa to 
> > 
> > commit 465fee75ee8991349da742e5a1a5be3cd179bb62
> > Author: Roland Scheidegger <sroland at vmware.com>
> > Date:   Sat Nov 21 04:39:30 2009 -0800
> > 
> >     intel: make CopyTex[Sub]Image fallback debug messages more
> > consistent
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > And compiled the xserver with --disable-aiglx 
> > (I will always use that option from now on, because I hate the way X and
> > mesa are tied otherwise. For example X won't build if I compile it
> > against old mesa, etc...)
> 
> If you can't get AIGLX to work then it may indicate a bigger problem.
> X needs to load a DRI driver to perform acceleration for indirect
> clients, I'm not sure what in that is hate-worthy.
> 
> > And now all 3D problems are gone.
> > 
> > I now doing a bisect, although I am not sure if it will help much.
> 
> Probably not.  It sounds like your configuration is pretty custom and
> something is seriously broken, so it'll be hard to help further.

I don't think so. Older mesa works, new one works too but with bugs. New
mesa just contains a lot of bugs.

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky