[Intel-gfx] [Mesa3d-dev] i965 OpenGL is heavily broken again

Maxim Levitsky maximlevitsky at gmail.com
Sat Mar 6 15:40:27 CET 2010


On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 14:10 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: 
> On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 11:18 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:48:48 +0200
> > Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:36 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:18:07 +0200
> > > > Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:55 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:42:21 +0200
> > > > > > Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > After quite long period of inactivity, I updated graphical stack on my
> > > > > > > desktop/server.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > To say the truth, I did such update about month ago, but found out that
> > > > > > > X refuses flatly to use DRI modules. I assumed that it was my mistake in
> > > > > > > compilation process (although it is automated).
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > That generally indicates a build or config problem of some kind.  Did
> > > > > > you ever narrow it down?
> > > > > Because the same compile process works now, I suspect that wasn't build
> > > > > failure.
> > > > 
> > > > Well something weird is going on; maybe you didn't build X after Mesa
> > > > or with the right Mesa includes?
> > > I am very sure that this issue isn't relevant now.
> > > 
> > > I do compile (libdrm, mesa, xserver, xf86-intel, and evdev driver in
> > > that order, compiling everything from scratch (doing git clean -dfx in
> > > all directories)
> > 
> > if you just want a working setup, perhaps you should try using
> > something that got (probably) tested by at least some people:
> >  	http://intellinuxgraphics.org/2009Q4.html
> > cheers,
> > Flo
> 
> Well, I now have a working setup with mesa 
> ebbc73d1aed283c9bc4aa2b37bed4374bbaec5b5
> 
> The problem is that I hoped that once all heavy work in regard to KMS
> was done, there will be no serious regressions in 3D stack, but only bug
> fixes, because it is very hard to track and fix bugs there.
> 
> However, once again 3D stack is in bad shape, and this is not good.


More testing shows the following behaviour:



Full screen mode is completely busted. As soon as any 3D application
switches to full screen mode, even without changing the resolution, it
hangs (note that I didn't see GPU hangs due to that)

Compiz is broken (its also a full screen app...). As soon as it starts,
it draws few windows, and then stalls.

In window mode all applications do work.


Now I guess this is worth a bugzilla entry.
(If this isn't there yet...)


Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky





More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list