[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/crt: Remove 0xa0 probe for CRT

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Apr 4 08:26:44 CEST 2011


Following the fix to reset the GMBUS controller after a NAK, we finally
utilize the 0xa0 probe for a CRT connection. And discover that it is
useless as it simply detects the presence of the controller and not the
actual monitor. Given that we already probe 0x50 prior to performing the
EDID retrieval, we can simply remove the redundant probe to 0xa0.

Reported-and-tested-by: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe at yahoo.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35904
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c |   20 --------------------
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
index 8342259..d03fc05 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
@@ -269,21 +269,6 @@ static bool intel_crt_detect_hotplug(struct drm_connector *connector)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static bool intel_crt_ddc_probe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int ddc_bus)
-{
-	u8 buf;
-	struct i2c_msg msgs[] = {
-		{
-			.addr = 0xA0,
-			.flags = 0,
-			.len = 1,
-			.buf = &buf,
-		},
-	};
-	/* DDC monitor detect: Does it ACK a write to 0xA0? */
-	return i2c_transfer(&dev_priv->gmbus[ddc_bus].adapter, msgs, 1) == 1;
-}
-
 static bool intel_crt_detect_ddc(struct drm_connector *connector)
 {
 	struct intel_crt *crt = intel_attached_crt(connector);
@@ -293,11 +278,6 @@ static bool intel_crt_detect_ddc(struct drm_connector *connector)
 	if (crt->base.type != INTEL_OUTPUT_ANALOG)
 		return false;
 
-	if (intel_crt_ddc_probe(dev_priv, dev_priv->crt_ddc_pin)) {
-		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("CRT detected via DDC:0xa0\n");
-		return true;
-	}
-
 	if (intel_ddc_probe(&crt->base, dev_priv->crt_ddc_pin)) {
 		struct edid *edid;
 		bool is_digital = false;
-- 
1.7.4.1




More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list