[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: small semaphore fix

[Ben Widawsky]

On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:03:07 -0700
Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net> wrote:

> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:47:22 -0700, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
> wrote:
> > Assertion + unsigned helps catch potential issues.
> > 
> > From the docs it is hard to tell if the global GTT flag is actually
> > needed, but it shouldn't hurt.
> 
> We're updating a register, not the GTT, so I don't see why the flag
> would be relevant.

The patch is as (ir)relevant as without it which implies PPGTT. The
reason it was there is in another branch I was planning to implement
memory based semaphores.

I have the refactor patch coming soon, should probably ignore this.