[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: small semaphore fix
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Sep 2 10:56:31 CEST 2011
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 19:51:11 -0700, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:03:07 -0700
> Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:47:22 -0700, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
> > wrote:
> > > Assertion + unsigned helps catch potential issues.
> > >
> > > From the docs it is hard to tell if the global GTT flag is actually
> > > needed, but it shouldn't hurt.
> >
> > We're updating a register, not the GTT, so I don't see why the flag
> > would be relevant.
>
> The patch is as (ir)relevant as without it which implies PPGTT. The
> reason it was there is in another branch I was planning to implement
> memory based semaphores.
Memory based semaphores required working ppgtt, afaict.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list