[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/exynos: reorder framebuffer init sequence

[Inki Dae]

2012/12/14 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>

> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Inki Dae <inki.dae at samsung.com> wrote:
> > How about rebasing this patch to top of
> > git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux.git drm-next?
> > Exynos's many patches have already been merged to drm-next. Or if you are
> > ok, I'd like to rebase your patch to -next and test it. I don't care
> either
> > way. :)
>
> I've pushed out a rebased version, but somehow I can't compile-test
> exynos any more :( Probably missing some other stuff from linux-next.
> Anyway, I don't mind which patch you pick or whether you just roll
> your own, the important thing is that drm_framebuffer_init is called
> _after_ everything is set up and initialized. Everything else doesn't
> really matter.
>

I've rebase your patch to -next and tested it. But your patch had null
pointer issue to gem object so I fixed it.
For this, you can refer to the below link,

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/daeinki/drm-exynos.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/exynos-drm-next

And I gonna request git pull to -next including that patch today. If there
is any problem, please let me know.

Thanks,
Inki Dae.



> -Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20121214/d5740e68/attachment.html>