[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/exynos: reorder framebuffer init sequence

[Daniel Vetter]

On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Inki Dae <inki.dae at samsung.com> wrote:
> 2012/12/14 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Inki Dae <inki.dae at samsung.com> wrote:
>> > How about rebasing this patch to top of
>> > git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux.git drm-next?
>> > Exynos's many patches have already been merged to drm-next. Or if you
>> > are
>> > ok, I'd like to rebase your patch to -next and test it. I don't care
>> > either
>> > way. :)
>>
>> I've pushed out a rebased version, but somehow I can't compile-test
>> exynos any more :( Probably missing some other stuff from linux-next.
>> Anyway, I don't mind which patch you pick or whether you just roll
>> your own, the important thing is that drm_framebuffer_init is called
>> _after_ everything is set up and initialized. Everything else doesn't
>> really matter.
>
>
> I've rebase your patch to -next and tested it. But your patch had null
> pointer issue to gem object so I fixed it.
> For this, you can refer to the below link,
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/daeinki/drm-exynos.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/exynos-drm-next
>
> And I gonna request git pull to -next including that patch today. If there
> is any problem, please let me know.

Oops, sorry for missing the gem obj assignment, your updated version
looks good. Thanks for fixing it up.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch