[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] reset rework, 2nd try

[Chris Wilson]

On Wed,  4 Jul 2012 22:18:38 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I took me a while to see the real issues Chris has been complaining about, but I
> think the reworked patches take them all into account now. The big change is
> that the wedged check at the beginning of intel_ring_begin stays, but gets
> improved by properly deciding betweein -EIO and -EAGAIN. I've checked all the
> callsites and couldn't find any issues.
> 
> Comments, flames, reviews and testing reports highly welcome.

Other than being dense and requiring a big loud comment explaining that
'EIO without !wedged' means an EIO emanating from another subsystem,
this looks good to me and more importantly survives battery from the
pathological renderer.

With the spelling mistakes fixed and an improved comment for the
SIGBUS patch,
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Tested-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>

The only last item on my wishlist for this series would be to capture
more of your discovery as code comments for next time...
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre