[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] reset rework, 2nd try

[Daniel Vetter]

On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 09:54:09PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed,  4 Jul 2012 22:18:38 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I took me a while to see the real issues Chris has been complaining about, but I
> > think the reworked patches take them all into account now. The big change is
> > that the wedged check at the beginning of intel_ring_begin stays, but gets
> > improved by properly deciding betweein -EIO and -EAGAIN. I've checked all the
> > callsites and couldn't find any issues.
> > 
> > Comments, flames, reviews and testing reports highly welcome.
> 
> Other than being dense and requiring a big loud comment explaining that
> 'EIO without !wedged' means an EIO emanating from another subsystem,
> this looks good to me and more importantly survives battery from the
> pathological renderer.
> 
> With the spelling mistakes fixed and an improved comment for the
> SIGBUS patch,
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Tested-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>

I've queued the entire series for next, thanks a lot for the review and
testing.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48