[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Remove explicit flush from i915_gem_object_flush_fence()

[Chris Wilson]

As the flush is either performed explictly immediately after the
execbuffer dispatch, or before the serialisation of last_fenced_seqno we
can forgo the explict i915_gem_flush_ring().

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |   16 ++--------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 535dd61..e574835 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2455,21 +2455,8 @@ static void i915_gem_object_update_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 static int
 i915_gem_object_flush_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 {
-	int ret;
-
-	if (obj->fenced_gpu_access) {
-		if (obj->base.write_domain & I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS) {
-			ret = i915_gem_flush_ring(obj->ring,
-						  0, obj->base.write_domain);
-			if (ret)
-				return ret;
-		}
-
-		obj->fenced_gpu_access = false;
-	}
-
 	if (obj->last_fenced_seqno) {
-		ret = i915_wait_seqno(obj->ring, obj->last_fenced_seqno);
+		int ret = i915_wait_seqno(obj->ring, obj->last_fenced_seqno);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
@@ -2482,6 +2469,7 @@ i915_gem_object_flush_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 	if (obj->base.read_domains & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT)
 		mb();
 
+	obj->fenced_gpu_access = false;
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.10.4