[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Check VBIOS value for determining LVDS dual channel mode, too
Takashi Iwai
tiwai at suse.de
Sat Mar 17 08:59:56 CET 2012
At Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:18:03 -0700,
Keith Packard wrote:
>
> <#part sign=pgpmime>
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:41:12 +0100, Takashi Iwai <tiwai at suse.de> wrote:
>
> > +/* read the initial LVDS register value for the given panel mode */
> > +static unsigned int get_lvds_reg_val(const struct bdb_header *bdb,
> > + const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data_ptrs *ptrs,
> > + int index,
> > + struct drm_display_mode *mode)
>
> To follow the style of intel_bios.c, I think it would make sense to have
> the function:
>
> static const struct lvds_dvo_timing *
> get_lvds_fp_timing(const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data *lvds_lfp_data,
> const struct bdb_lvds_lfp_data_ptrs *lvds_lfp_data_ptrs,
> int index)
>
> then use the results of this in parse_lfp_panel_data, instead of putting
> the whole computation into this new function.
Well, the LVDS reg data isn't in lvds_dvo_timing but in lvds_fp_timing,
thus you need to look at a different entry in anyway.
> I'd also like to see this code only use the BDB value when the LVDS is
> disabled at startup time; otherwise, we'll be changing the behavior for
> all LVDS users, and as BIOS tables are notoriously unreliable, I fear
> that we'll cause a lot more problems than we solve.
I skipped it to simplify the code, but that'd be safer, indeed.
(Though, the chance of getting a wrong value is fairly small since
the function verifies whether the resolution of the entry matches
with the given mode, too.)
thanks,
Takashi
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list