[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't override PPGTT cacheability on HSW
Kenneth Graunke
kenneth at whitecape.org
Wed Apr 3 21:17:28 CEST 2013
On 04/03/2013 11:06 AM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> Apparently these ECOCHK bits changed on HSW and the behavior is not what
> we want. I've not been able to find VLV definition specifically so I'll
> assume it's the same as IVB.
>
> (Only compile tested)
>
> Reported-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
The behavior isn't particularly bad, but the PTEs already take care of
this for us, so it doesn't do anything. That said, having random
override bits set for no purpose is bad...we should just let the PTEs do
their job.
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
Thanks Ben!
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list