[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't override PPGTT cacheability on HSW

Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Thu Apr 4 13:31:09 CEST 2013


On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 10:08:26PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > So I've checked hsw bspec and the problem is that hw guys again
> > changed the bits around a bit, and I think on HSW we actually want
> > (0x8 << 3) instead of what's currently there.
> 
> Meh, I've screwed up reading the tables, 0x3 << 3 is what we imo want,
> so nothing needs to be changed. Sorry for the confusion.

Shouldn't it be (1<<3) on IVB (for just LLC w/o GFDT), and (3<<3) on
the rest?

Also what about the GAC_ECO_BITS register? BSpec tells me it exists on
IVB and HSW as well. It also seems to have a bit very similar to
ECOCHK_SNB_BIT but we don't actually set it on SNB.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list