[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/17] drm/i915: Use the stored cursor and plane latencies properly
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Thu Aug 1 15:18:51 CEST 2013
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Rather than pass around the plane latencies, just grab them from
dev_priv nearer to where they're needed. Do the same for cursor
latencies.
v2: Add some comments about latency units
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index afa7f25..f754ca2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2255,7 +2255,8 @@ static uint32_t ilk_compute_fbc_wm(struct hsw_pipe_wm_parameters *params,
params->pri_bytes_per_pixel);
}
-static bool hsw_compute_lp_wm(uint32_t mem_value, struct hsw_wm_maximums *max,
+static bool hsw_compute_lp_wm(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+ int level, struct hsw_wm_maximums *max,
struct hsw_pipe_wm_parameters *params,
struct hsw_lp_wm_result *result)
{
@@ -2264,10 +2265,14 @@ static bool hsw_compute_lp_wm(uint32_t mem_value, struct hsw_wm_maximums *max,
for (pipe = PIPE_A; pipe <= PIPE_C; pipe++) {
struct hsw_pipe_wm_parameters *p = ¶ms[pipe];
+ /* WM1+ latency values stored in 0.5us units */
+ uint16_t pri_latency = dev_priv->wm.pri_latency[level] * 5;
+ uint16_t spr_latency = dev_priv->wm.spr_latency[level] * 5;
+ uint16_t cur_latency = dev_priv->wm.cur_latency[level] * 5;
- pri_val[pipe] = ilk_compute_pri_wm(p, mem_value, true);
- spr_val[pipe] = ilk_compute_spr_wm(p, mem_value);
- cur_val[pipe] = ilk_compute_cur_wm(p, mem_value);
+ pri_val[pipe] = ilk_compute_pri_wm(p, pri_latency, true);
+ spr_val[pipe] = ilk_compute_spr_wm(p, spr_latency);
+ cur_val[pipe] = ilk_compute_cur_wm(p, cur_latency);
fbc_val[pipe] = ilk_compute_fbc_wm(p, pri_val[pipe]);
}
@@ -2290,14 +2295,18 @@ static bool hsw_compute_lp_wm(uint32_t mem_value, struct hsw_wm_maximums *max,
}
static uint32_t hsw_compute_wm_pipe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
- uint32_t mem_value, enum pipe pipe,
+ enum pipe pipe,
struct hsw_pipe_wm_parameters *params)
{
uint32_t pri_val, cur_val, spr_val;
+ /* WM0 latency values stored in 0.1us units */
+ uint16_t pri_latency = dev_priv->wm.pri_latency[0];
+ uint16_t spr_latency = dev_priv->wm.spr_latency[0];
+ uint16_t cur_latency = dev_priv->wm.cur_latency[0];
- pri_val = ilk_compute_pri_wm(params, mem_value, false);
- spr_val = ilk_compute_spr_wm(params, mem_value);
- cur_val = ilk_compute_cur_wm(params, mem_value);
+ pri_val = ilk_compute_pri_wm(params, pri_latency, false);
+ spr_val = ilk_compute_spr_wm(params, spr_latency);
+ cur_val = ilk_compute_cur_wm(params, cur_latency);
WARN(pri_val > 127,
"Primary WM error, mode not supported for pipe %c\n",
@@ -2463,7 +2472,6 @@ static void hsw_compute_wm_parameters(struct drm_device *dev,
static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
struct hsw_pipe_wm_parameters *params,
- uint16_t *wm,
struct hsw_wm_maximums *lp_maximums,
struct hsw_wm_values *results)
{
@@ -2474,7 +2482,8 @@ static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
int level, max_level, wm_lp;
for (level = 1; level <= 4; level++)
- if (!hsw_compute_lp_wm(wm[level] * 5, lp_maximums, params,
+ if (!hsw_compute_lp_wm(dev_priv, level,
+ lp_maximums, params,
&lp_results[level - 1]))
break;
max_level = level - 1;
@@ -2506,8 +2515,7 @@ static void hsw_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
}
for_each_pipe(pipe)
- results->wm_pipe[pipe] = hsw_compute_wm_pipe(dev_priv, wm[0],
- pipe,
+ results->wm_pipe[pipe] = hsw_compute_wm_pipe(dev_priv, pipe,
¶ms[pipe]);
for_each_pipe(pipe) {
@@ -2650,11 +2658,9 @@ static void haswell_update_wm(struct drm_device *dev)
hsw_compute_wm_parameters(dev, params, &lp_max_1_2, &lp_max_5_6);
hsw_compute_wm_results(dev, params,
- dev_priv->wm.pri_latency,
&lp_max_1_2, &results_1_2);
if (lp_max_1_2.pri != lp_max_5_6.pri) {
hsw_compute_wm_results(dev, params,
- dev_priv->wm.pri_latency,
&lp_max_5_6, &results_5_6);
best_results = hsw_find_best_result(&results_1_2, &results_5_6);
} else {
--
1.8.1.5
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list